[스크랩] Re:인용을 하시려면 정확하게 하셔야 합니다.

몇 사람의 글을 인용하셨는데, 정확한 인용들이 아닌 것 같아서, 제가 첫 사람, 곧 도널드 맥클레오드의 글을  인용하면서 전혀 폴님의 주장을 지지해 주는 것이 아님만을 밝혀놓겠습니다.

 

도널드 맥클레오드의 윗인용이 된 글의 앞뒤 문맥입니다.

 

A human psychology

 

The second factor involved in the assumption of human nature is that Christ took an ordinary human psychology. He bacame man 'by taking to Himself a true body and a reasonable soul'(Shorter Catechism, Answer 22). This truth, too, was denied by an early heresy, Apollinarianism, the product of over-sensitiveness regading the deity of Christ. Apollinarius was so concerned to safeguard the fact that Christ was God that he minimised His humanness, and that has been a very common tendency in the church right down to the present day. His position was, that when God became incarnate He indeed took a human body, but in the place of a human soul there was simply God the Logos, the Eternal Word. There was a union between a divine nature and a human body but there was no human psychology. The church of the late fourth and early fitth centruy discussed this issue thoroughly, repudiated this construction of Apollinarius and insisted that just as in Christ there was complete and perfect Godhead so there was complete and perfect manhood. Nothing that was necessary to humanness was lacking to Him. Just as there was a complete human physicalness so there was a complete human psychology(A Faith to Live by, Fearn: Christian Focus Publications, 1998.p.118-119).

 

 

위의 인용글을 보면, 전혀 님의 입장을 지지하지 않습니다. 맥클레오드는 전혀 예수님의 manhood와 human nature는 인정하여도, human person임을 인정하는 표현을 하지 않고 있습니다.

 

 

대신 몇 페이지 뒤에 가면 이런 말이 나옵니다.

 

Secondly, the uni-personality of Christ. Although truly divine and truly and perfectly human He was (and is ) one Person. The essential point ehre is that whatever He did was done by the Son of God. He made the word and He died on the cross. A nature did not do it. He did it. He bled., and died to take away my sin. He gave, not merely His sufferings, not only His human nature: He gave Himself(p.127).

 

그가 무엇을 강조하고 있는 지를 보십시오.

 

다른 인용자들의 글들도 님의 입장을 지지해 주지 않는 것 같군요. 시간이 없어서, 맨 처음의 인용만 반박합니다.

 

 

출처 : 양무리마을

글쓴이 : holyjoy 원글보기

메모 :